Pareja-Blanco, Fernando , Rodriguez-Rosell, David , Sanchez-Medina, Luis , Ribas-Serna, Juan , Lopez-Lopez, Covadonga , Mora-Custodio, Ricardo , YAÑEZ GARCÍA, JUAN MANUEL, Jose Gonzalez-Badillo, Juan
No
Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging
Article
Científica
2.6
0.876
01/11/2017
000413678400012
This study compared the time course of recovery following two resistance exercise protocols differing in the number of repetitions per set with regard to the maximum possible (to failure) number. Ten men performed three sets of 6 versus 12 repetitions with their 70% 1 RM (3 x 6 [12] versus 3 x 12 [12]) in the bench press (BP) and squat (SQ) exercises. Mechanical [CMJ height, velocity against the 1 ms(-1) load (V-1-load)], biochemical [testosterone, cortisol, growth hormone, prolactin, insulin-like growth factor-1, creatine kinase (CK)] and heart rate variability (HRV) and complexity (HRC) were assessed pre-, postexercise (Post) and at 6, 24 and 48 h-Post. Compared with 3 x 6 [12], the 3 x 12 [12] protocol resulted in significantly: higher repetition velocity loss within each set (BP: 65% versus 26%; SQ: 44% versus 20%); reduced V-1-load until 24 h-Post (BP) and 6h-Post (SQ); decreased CMJ height up to 48 h-Post; greater increases in cortisol (Post), prolactin (Post, 48 h-Post) and CK (48 h-Post); and reductions in HRV and HRC at Post. This study shows that the mechanical, neuroendocrine and autonomic cardiovascular response is markedly different when manipulating the number of repetitions per set. Halving the number of repetitions in relation to the maximum number that can be completed serves to minimize fatigue and speed up recovery following resistance training.
heart rate complexity; heart rate variability; hormonal response; neuromuscular fatigue; strength training; velocity-based resistance training