LÓPEZ RODRÍGUEZ, ANA MERCEDES
No
Front. Blockchain
Article
Científica
3
0
Internacional
20/10/2025
10167
2-s2.0-105020726369
Blockchain-based metaverse platforms such as Decentraland and The Sandbox offer a vision of decentralized digital ownership and seamless cross-border interaction, yet expose users to significant legal and security risks due to fragmented consumer protection frameworks. This article undertakes a comparative legal analysis of six major jurisdictions-the European Union, United States, China, Singapore, Brazil, and South Korea-focusing on jurisdictional issues, data privacy, liability, and dispute resolution within decentralized virtual worlds. The findings reveal a fragmented regulatory landscape, with ongoing gaps that contribute to declining user trust and engagement. These unresolved legal challenges, alongside persistent security vulnerabilities, undermine the long-term viability of metaverse ecosystems. To address these problems, the paper proposes a hybrid governance framework that integrates blockchain-native tools, such as smart contract arbitration, with enforceable legal standards. This approach aims to align innovation with accountability and foster a more trustworthy, sustainable, and user-centered metaverse.
blockchain-based metaverse; consumer protection; jurisdiction and conflict of laws; decentralized governance (DAOs); smart contracts; dispute resolution (ADR/ODR/BDR); comparative legal analysis