Título Content Validity through Expert Judgment for the Depression Clinical Evaluation Test
Autores GUILLOT VALDES, MARIA, Guillen-Riquelme, Alejandro , Buela-Casal, Gualberto
Publicación externa Si
Medio Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol.
Alcance Article
Naturaleza Científica
Cuartil JCR 1
Cuartil SJR 1
Impacto JCR 8.8
Impacto SJR 2.324
Fecha de publicacion 01/05/2022
ISI 000775636400004
DOI 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100292
Abstract Background/Objective: The evaluation of depression requires valid and reliable measuring instruments, which collect a wide spectrum of symptoms that this disorder displays, in order to carry out an accurate and differential diagnosis. The objective of this work is the construction of the Depression Clinical Evaluation Test (DCET), where affective, somatic, cognitive, behavioral and interpersonal symptoms are considered and also analyze its content validity through an expert judgment. Method: Based on different diagnostic and manual classifications, a specifica-tion table for a depression test was established. In its evaluation, 16 experts in Psychological Assessment, Psychometry and/or Psychopathology participated. A total of 300 items were created. The experts had to assess the items according to the criteria of Content, Relevance, Clarity, Comprehension, Sensitivity, and Offensiveness. In addition, 50 adults, evaluated the compression of the items. Results: The degree of understanding for all the items was high and the expert judgment favoured the suppression of 104 items, thus obtaining a shorter measuring instrument with a total of 196 items for ease of application. Conclusions: The content validity of the test is adequate and fits the agreed definition of depression.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Palabras clave Depression; Expert judgment; Assessment; Content validity; Instrumental study
Miembros de la Universidad Loyola