← Volver atrás
Publicaciones

Treatment inertia in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. FRENA registry

Autores

Roa, Leonor , Monreal, Manuel , CARMONA CARMONA, JOSÉ ALBERTO, Aguilar, Eduardo , Coll, Ramon , Suarez, Carmen , Grp FRENA

Publicación externa

Si

Medio

Med. Clin.

Alcance

Article

Naturaleza

Científica

Cuartil JCR

Cuartil SJR

Impacto JCR

1.413

Impacto SJR

0.252

Fecha de publicacion

30/01/2010

ISI

000274254500002

Abstract

Background and objective: Although nowadays there are many cardiovascular disease (CVD) treatment protocols and evidence based guidelines, not many patients achieve the recommended levels for cardiovascular (CV) risk factor (RF) and management of disorders could be improved. Treatment inertia (TI) is the failure of health care providers to initiate or intensify therapy when indicated. The purpose of this study was to quantify TI in secondary CV prevention and identify factors influencing TI. Patients and method: Observational, transversal study with 1660 patients included in FRENA (The FRENA registry recruited Spanish patients in CVD secondary prevention treated by different specialists), aged 66,3 years, 74% males, 38,5% females, 38,5% coronary heart disease (CHD), 30,8% cerebrovascular disease and 32% peripheral artery disease (PAD). Final variable: TI: three types of inertia where described: treatment failure inertia, RF control inertia and the third one was at least one of the previous. Uni and multivariate analysis were done for each type of inertia. Results: Inertia was detected in 81,5% of the patients. RF control inertia was 85,1% and treatment failure inertia 53%. Diabetic patients are likely to be treated with TI whereas patients with renal insufficiency (RI) or arterial hypertension (AHT) are more likely to be protected against it. There is less treatment failure inertia in cerebrovascular disease or coronary heart disease Vs PAD, AHT and Dyslipemia (DL) where the rate of treatment failure inertia is higher. RF control inertia increases with the coexistence of AHT, DL and diabetes mellitus (DM) and is lower in patients with previous CVD, cerebrovascular disease, AHT and DL. Conclusions: In high risk patient, TI is present in a high percentage of them. DM, PAD and the coexistence of cardiovascular risk factors are associated with a higher inertia. (C) 2009 Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.

Palabras clave

Treatment inertia; Secondary cardiovascular prevention; Clinical guidelines

Miembros de la Universidad Loyola