Title Cognitive reflection test: Whom, how, when
Authors BRAÑAS GARZA, PABLO ERNESTO, Kujal P. , Lenkei B.
External publication No
Means J. Behave. Exp. Econ.
Scope Article
Nature Científica
JCR Quartile 3
SJR Quartile 1
JCR Impact 1.14500
SJR Impact 0.69500
Web https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85070581350&doi=10.1016%2fj.socec.2019.101455&partnerID=40&md5=708f1425d9daed872c5ee3481059eeec
Publication date 01/10/2019
ISI 000492860500002
Scopus Id 2-s2.0-85070581350
DOI 10.1016/j.socec.2019.101455
Abstract The use of the Cognitive Reflection Test as a covariate to explain behavior in Economics and Psychology experiments has significantly increased in the past few years. Experiments have shown its usefulness in predicting behavior. However, little is known about if the test is gender biased, whether incentives matter or how different implementation procedures impact outcomes. Here we report the results of a meta-study of 118 Cognitive Reflection Test studies comprising of 44,558 participants across 21 countries. We find that there is a negative correlation between being female and the overall, and individual, correct answers to CRT questions. Monetary incentives do not impact performance. Regarding implementation procedures, taking the test at the end of the experiment negatively impacts performance. Students perform better compared to non-students. We obtain mixed evidence on whether the sequence of questions matters. Finally, we find that computerized tests marginally improve results. © 2019 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords CRT; Experiments; Gender; Incentives
Universidad Loyola members

Change your preferences Manage cookies