Title Effect of exercise on bone health in children and adolescents with cancer during and after oncological treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors Marmol-Perez, Andres , Ubago-Guisado, Esther , Rodriguez-Solana, Andrea , GIL COSANO, JOSÉ JUAN, Martinez-Vizcaino, Vicente , Cavero-Redondo, Ivan , Ruiz, Jonatan R. , Gracia-Marco, Luis
External publication No
Means Front. Physiol.
Scope Review
Nature Científica
JCR Quartile 2
SJR Quartile 2
Web https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85153370265&doi=10.3389%2ffphys.2023.1088740&partnerID=40&md5=1966ff481c6cff8d170f46b9e8e932c2
Publication date 14/03/2023
ISI 000964918600001
Scopus Id 2-s2.0-85153370265
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2023.1088740
Abstract Background: Although regular physical activity and exercise programs might improve bone health caused by oncological treatment and the disease itself, it remains unknown the pooled effect of exercise interventions following frequency, intensity, time and type prescriptions.Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise evidence regarding the effectiveness of exercise interventions on bone health in children and adolescents with cancer during and after oncological treatment.Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science and Scopus databases from November 2021 to January 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs reporting pre-post changes of the effectiveness of exercise interventions on DXA-measured bone parameters in young population (1-19 years) during or after oncological treatment were included. Pooled (ESs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed.Results: A total of eight trials with 341 participants were included. The meta-analyses did not reveal a statistically significant increase in whole body areal bone mineral density (ES = 0.10; 95%CI: -0.14, 0.34), lumbar spine (ES = 0.03; 95%CI: -0.21, 0.26) or femoral neck (ES = 0.10; 95%CI: -0.37, 0.56). Similarly, during the oncological treatment phase the ES was 0.04 (95%CI: -0.17, 0.25) and after the ES was 0.07 (95%CI: -0.20, 0.33).Conclusion: To date, exercise interventions have been inappropriate and therefore, ineffective to illustrate any beneficial effect on bone health in children and adolescents with cancer during and after oncological treatment.
Keywords bone mineral density; dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; impact-loading exercise; paediatrics; physical activity; weight-bearing exercise
Universidad Loyola members

Change your preferences Manage cookies